In vitro Effect of Occlusal Loading on Cervical Wall Lesion Development in a Class II Composite Restoration.

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of simulated occlusal loading on wall lesion development in cervical gaps of class II composite restorations in vitro. Sixty-four extracted human molars received standardized (4.0 × 4.2 × 3.0 mm) box preparations. The teeth were randomly assigned to one of two restoration groups: restoration with a normal or a low E-modulus composite material (CLEARFIL AP-X: E-modulus 16.8 GPa or CLEARFIL MAJESTY ES Flow: E-modulus 6.6 GPa). A metal matrix was placed at the bottom of the box for each restoration, creating a cervical gap of about 100 µm wide. Samples were exposed to simulated caries lesion development in a lactic acid solution (pH 4.8) for 8 weeks in a Rub&Roll device. Half of the samples were subjected to 90 N cyclic loading. After demineralization, the teeth were sectioned. Wall lesion development was measured using microradiography (transversal wavelength-independent microradiography) in two different locations (location 1: 1,000 µm and location 2: 1,600 µm from the gap entrance) and recorded in lesion depth (LD) (µm) and mineral loss (µm × vol%). Linear regression modeling was used to estimate the effect of loading and material on wall lesion development. Mean wall LD in location 1 across all groups was 150.83 µm with a standard deviation (SD) of 61.83 µm. In location 2, mean overall wall LD was 102.98 µm with an SD of 64.92 µm. Linear regression showed no significant effect of either loading or material on wall lesion development. Occlusal loading had no significant effect on secondary caries lesion development in composite class II restoration in this in vitro study.

Aging Reduces the Anticaries Effect of Antibacterial Adhesive - An In Vitro Biofilm Study.

PURPOSE: This in vitro study investigated whether aging different restorative materials influences secondary caries development using a short-term in vitro biofilm model, hypothesizing that the antibacterial adhesive employed may lose its effect over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty enamel-dentin blocks were divided into 6 groups with n = 10 per group. The groups were restored with three different restorative materials, of which each sample contained an artificial gap: composite with conventional adhesive (CCA; negative control), composite with an antibacterial adhesive (CAA), and amalgam (A; positive control). Half of the groups were prepared fresh and half of the groups were submitted to an aging protocol consisting of water storage, thermocycling, storage in human saliva, and storage in 0.9% saline solution. All specimens were subjected to an intermittent 1% sucrose biofilm model for 20 days to create artificial caries lesions. Lesion progression in the enamel and dentin next to the different materials was measured as lesion depth (LD) and mineral loss (ML), using transverse wavelength independent microradiography (T-WIM). Regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of aging on LD and ML per restorative material, corrected for gap size. RESULTS: In the amalgam group, aging led to shallower lesions and less mineral loss. Fresh amalgam samples showed an average lesion depth of 156.65 ± 39.18 µm at wall dentin locations. Aged amalgam samples had an average lesion depth of 73.42 ± 73.50 µm. Fresh CAA samples showed lower average surface mineral loss values (9104 ± 2631 µm•vol%) than did fresh CCA samples (13166 ± 4769 µm•vol%). After aging, this effect was absent, and the average mineral loss in the CAA group was 13382 ± 5586 µm•vol%, while in the CCA group it was 15518 ± 9283 µm•vol%. CONCLUSION: Aging can influence secondary caries development either positively or negatively depending on the kind of restorative material. Antibacterial adhesives may lose their effectiveness over time.

Chlorhexidine, a Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor and the Development of Secondary Caries Wall Lesions in a Microcosm Biofilm Model.

This study investigated the role of a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor (CHX 2%) in the development of secondary caries wall lesions in different interface conditions with small (run 1) and wider gaps (run 2). Dentin discs were restored and pretreated with or without CHX 2%. In run 1, interfaces were made with gaps of 30, 60, or 90 µm. Interfaces with composite placed directly onto the dentin were either bonded (Adper Single Bond 2) or not bonded. In run 2, interfaces were made with gaps of 100 µm, with or without adhesive on the composite side (CLEARFIL SE Bond). Interfaces were either bonded or not bonded, as in run 1. Microcosm biofilms were grown on dentin-composite samples for 14 days. Caries lesion outcomes were analyzed by transversal wavelength-independent microradiography at 3 locations: the outer surface, and the interface wall at a distance of 200 and 500 µm from the gap entrance. Linear regression analyses showed that pretreatment with MMP inhibitor did not influence progression of the wall lesion at any location (p ≥ 0.218). Interfaces with intentional gaps showed positive and significant effect on the wall lesion progression at 200 µm from the gap entrance (p ≤ 0.005). A small trend of increase in wall lesion development was observed at the 200-µm location when bonding was present on the composite side. In conclusion, the dentin pretreatment with CHX 2% was not able to slow down the development of secondary caries wall lesions in small and wide gaps in this biofilm model.

Secondary Caries in situ Models: A Systematic Review.

In situ caries research serves as a bridge between clinical research and laboratory studies. In this kind of research, volunteers wear a removable intraoral splint or prosthesis containing research samples. Many different in situ models exist to investigate secondary caries. This systematic review compared currently existing secondary caries models and their lesion progression per day values. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane) were searched for relevant literature. Bias risk was assessed and model parameters and caries-related outcomes were extracted by 2 independent researchers. Where possible, caries-related outcomes were normalized by estimating lesion progression per day by dividing lesion depth extracted from microradiographic or microhardness data by the number of days the study lasted. RESULTS: The literature search identified 335 articles. After eliminating duplicates and selection, 31 articles were included. The models differed greatly on factors such as sample location, presence of fluoride in the model, and analysis methods. Three main groups could be identified by sample placement; 68% of models placed samples palatally in the upper jaw, and the lower jaw model could be divided into the buccal (26%) and approximal (6%) areas. Average lesion progression in enamel next to composite was 4.3 ± 2.8 µm (range1.1-8.8 µm/day). DISCUSSION: Studies conducted with palatal models showed caries progression rates 2-5 times higher than the estimated clinical progression rates. Lesion progression per day could be a useful tool for future comparison of models and establishing a standardized model.

Minimal Gap Size and Dentin Wall Lesion Development Next to Resin Composite in a Microcosm Biofilm Model.

This in vitro study investigated the development of dentin wall lesions next to resin composite containing very small gap sizes using an in vitro biofilm model, and evaluated whether a relevant threshold for the gap size could be established. Microcosm biofilms were grown for 14 days within small interfacial gaps between dentin-resin composite discs under intermittent cariogenic challenge. The factor under study was gap size: samples were either restored with composite resin without adhesive procedure (no intentional gap; no bonding [NB] group) or with intentional gaps of 30, 60, or 90 µm, or with complete adhesive procedure (no gap; bonding [B] group). Secondary caries wall lesion progression was measured in lesion depth (LD) and mineral loss (ML) using transversal wavelength independent microradiography at 3 locations: outer surface lesion and wall lesions at 200 and 500 µm distance from gap entrance. Results from linear regression analysis showed that the presence of an intentional gap (30, 60, and 90 µm) affected the secondary caries progression at 200 µm from the gap entrance (p ≤ 0.013). The NB group did not show significant wall lesion development (ML and LD, p ≥ 0.529). At 500 µm distance almost no wall caries development was observed. In conclusion, dentin wall lesions developed in minimal gap sizes, and the threshold for secondary wall lesion development was a gap of around 30 µm in this microcosm biofilm model.

Secondary Caries Development in in situ Gaps next to Composite and Amalgam.

This in situ study investigated the secondary caries development in dentin in gaps next to composite and amalgam. For 21 days, 14 volunteers wore a modified occlusal splint containing human dentin samples with an average gap of 215 µm (SD=55 µm) restored with three different materials: Filtek Supreme composite, Clearfil AP-X composite and Tytin amalgam. Eight times a day, the splint with samples was dipped in a 20% sucrose solution for 10 min. Before and after caries development, specimens were imaged with transversal wavelength independent microradiography, and lesion depth (LD) and mineral loss (ML) were calculated. The LD and ML of the three restoration materials were compared within patients using paired t tests (α=5%). In total 38 composite samples (Filtek n=19 and AP-X n=19) and 19 amalgam samples could be used for data analysis. AP-X composite presented the highest mean values of LD and ML of the three restorative materials. Amalgam showed statistically significantly less ML (Δ=452 µm×vol%) than the combined composite materials (p=0.036). When comparing amalgam to the separate composite materials, only AP-X composite showed higher ML (Δ=515 µm×vol%) than amalgam (p=0.034). Analysis of LD showed the same trends, but these were not statistically significant. In conclusion, amalgam showed reduced secondary caries progression in dentin in gaps compared to composite materials tested in this in situ model.

Wall-lesion development in gaps: The role of the adhesive bonding material.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the caries wall lesion development in different composite-dentin interfaces to investigate if the presence and location of two bonding materials in the gaps influence wall caries lesion development. METHODS: Fourteen volunteers wore a modified occlusal splint containing samples with four different interfaces: perfect bonding/no gap, or with a fixed gap (234±30 µm) with either no bonding material, bonding material (Clearfil Protect Bond-PB and Clearfil SE Bond-SE) on dentin or on composite. Eight times a day, the samples were dipped in 20% sucrose solution for 10 min, during 3 weeks. The samples were imaged with microradiography (T-WIM), and lesion depth (LD) and mineral loss (ML) were measured. The data were analysed with paired t-test. RESULTS: The perfect bonding group did not show any caries wall lesion development, whereas all other interfaces did. The interface with bonding on dentin did not show significantly different wall lesion development from the interface with no material. However, when bonding was present on composite, both LD and ML were significantly higher than both other gap conditions (p-values<0.05). A difference between the bonding material was only seen when applied on composite: PB showed less ML than SE (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of bonding on the composite side of a composite-dentin gap increased wall lesion development in situ. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The presence and location of an adhesive bonding material in the composite-dentin gaps plays a role on the wall caries lesion development.